A 65-year-old male was admitted for treatment of lymphoma...

On hospital day 5, the patient developed an acute change in mental status that worsened over the day; he was unable to tolerate a lumbar puncture at the bedside. In Interventional Radiology (IR), the patient required incremental doses of Ativan for the management of his altered mental status and acute agitation. The incremental doses of medication were obtained from the inpatient unit, but administered by the IR nurse. The patient arrested and expired during the procedure.

Emerging Risk: Interventional Radiology


Responsible Service

Number
of Cases1

Percent
of Cases

Percent
of Losses2

diagnostic radiology 2,259 4% 4%
interventional radiology 317 <1% <1%

1. 2007–2016 (N=58,691 cases, $11.5B incurred losses.
2. Losses are “total incurred losses” which includes reserves on open and payments on closed cases

Source: National Comparative Benchmarking System, CRICO

Analysis of CRICO’s National Comparative Benchmarking System (CBS) indicates that cases like the one above, in which Interventional Radiology* is the responsible service, account for less than one percent of all claims and suits filed since 2007, and just under one percent of financial losses. As the 2013 CBS Report, Malpractice Risks of Routine Medical Procedures indicated, however, the malpractice exposure for procedures outside the operating room is a growing concern. IR-related malpractice cases are rare, but they are not insignificant, especially given the dramatic shifts in IR practice. A shared sense of increased vulnerability in the IR setting led the Academic Medical Centers Patient Safety Organization (AMC PSO) to publish Patient Safety Framework for Risk Mitigation in Interventional Radiology.

When IR procedures are performed beyond the reach of a hospital’s safety net, then the risks associated with a complication during an IR procedure can be magnified. If the IR location is not designed to manage emergencies, or the staff is not adequately trained to rescue patients who experience complications, then IR patients and providers are at risk of serious injury and malpractice allegations.

The recently published Patient Safety Framework for Risk Mitigation in Interventional Radiology outlines recommendations for improved areas in the situational awareness and coordination of resources, staffing, and patient transfer of care along with suggestions to institutional leadership for improving collaboration with other departments.

*Interventional Radiology procedures include the use radiological image guidance (X-ray fluoroscopy, ultrasound, CT, or MRI).

Additional Material

Latest News from CRICO

Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.

    Medical Malpractice Allegations in Radiation Oncology: Results from a National Comparative Benchmarking System

    News
    Using data from the CRICO Strategies Comparative Benchmark System (CBS), CRICO patient safety experts Kathy Dwyer, Winnie Yu, and Courtney DeRoo collaborated with researchers from Harvard Radiation Oncology Program and the Department of Radiation Oncology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute to study the characteristics of radiation oncology (RO) malpractice cases and identify opportunities to decrease patient harm.

    Rates and Characteristics of Medical Malpractice Claims Against Hospitalists

    News
    Members of CRICO's Patient Safety Department's Analytics Team, Adam Schaffer, Jonathan Einbinder, Winnie Yu, Astrid Babayan, and Robert Wachter of the University of California, San Francisco (a Candello client) collaborated on research focused on the claims risk of hospitalists.
    1x1_auto_0135

    Utilization of Electronic Health Record Sex and Gender Demographic Fields: A Metadata and Mixed Methods Analysis

    News
    CRICO Grants
    This CRICO co-funded retroactive study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association analyzed the records of patients 18 years of age or older in the Mass General Brigham health system with a first Legal Sex entry (registration requirement) between 2018 and 2022. The study was important because “Sex and gender demographic data are widely viewed as essential to providing culturally responsive gender affirming care and facilitating research and public health interventions.”
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm