By examining the impact of five reporting systems, incident reporting, patient complaints, risk management, medical malpractice claims, and executive walk rounds, this study was able to determine which patient safety concerns could be identified by each system. Data was collected over a 22-month period at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, with data for malpractice claims collected from 1996-2006 using CRICO’s CMAPS database.

Little overlap was found in the reporting of each of the five systems, but each was found to address specific patient safety concerns that others could not. Communication problems appeared most often in patient complaints and malpractice claims. Malpractice claims saw the most reports in errors in clinical judgment. Walk rounds tended to identify issues with equipment and supplies, while adverse event reporting systems highlighted identification issues, especially mislabeled specimens. This suggests that hospitals should be using a variety of reporting systems to gain the full picture of patient safety issues.

Citation for the Full-text Article

Levtzion-Korach O, Frankel A, Alcalai H, et al. Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: Making sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Sep; 36(9): 402-410. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36059-4.

Latest News from CRICO

Get all your medmal and patient safety news here.

    CRICO’s Patient Safety Leadership: A Missing Piece

    News
    Jeffrey Cooper, Professor of Anaesthesia of Harvard Medical School, was inspired to write a letter to the editor of Patient Safety and Quality Healthcare (PSQH); in response to Susan Carr's article about CRICO’s milestone 40th anniversary. Dr. Cooper highlights CRICO’s greatest achievements: its ability to convene clinical leaders from across the Harvard medical community.

    Communication Failures in Medical Malpractice – Lessons Learned From Candello

    News
    This article, co-authored by Mazen Maktabi and CRICO's Gretchen Ruoff for the American Society of Anesthesiologists publication ASA Monitor, examines how analyzing theCandello database of medical malpractice claims enables organizations to glean valuable insight as to the extent and cause of potential patient safety risks.

    Human-Machine Collaborative Optimization via Apprenticeship Scheduling

    News
    This thesis project—Human-Machine Collaborative Optimization via Apprenticeship Scheduling—was co-funded by CRICO and submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
X
Cookies help us improve your website experience.
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies.
Confirm